The life of a line
A line would open at a certain time before an event starts. Different bookmakers would open at different times. The exact time of posting a line is an important decision for a bookmaker to make.
If you open first, you have the competitive advantage of offering a line that no one else offers (at least for a while). You win the action of the punters who want to bet straight away. But you have the disadvantage that you can’t “compare notes” with the competition and you are therefore at risk of putting up a wrong number, which can be costly. Furthermore, it would usually be the sharp punter who wants to hit the early line.
The early line simply offers more value than the late one and sharps know that. This doubles the risk for the bookmaker.
A line being born
In general, the bookies that open first are the ones who are more confident in their ability to make a decent line. This does not necessarily mean that they fully trust their opening numbers. Yes, a wrong number can be costly, but this cost can be easily capped using betting limits. After a bookie receives a bet on their opening line, they will move the line. With how much depends on the size of the bet (bigger bets would move the line more) and the history of the punter who has made it. The more respect the bookie has for the punter, the more the line will move.
After some time has passed and the bookie has collected a few bets, it is already more confident about its number and increases the limits on how much you can bet. This process repeats several times up until kick-off, when generally bookmakers will offer the highest limits.
Why increase the betting limits?
This is an important question. Why does the bookmaker increase their betting limits as game time comes closer? The bets that players are placing with a bookmaker are essentially something similar to a voting mechanism. The more bets a bookie has collected, the more information it has about the different viewpoints concerning the event at hand.
Of course, this is not a democratic process since not all votes are created equal. As mentioned above, the size of the bet and the history of the punter are decisive factors as to how seriously the bookmaker will take the bet and what influence it will have on the line. But by and large, as more money flows into the market, the more confident the bookmaker becomes about their current number.
The invisible hand of the market
Essentially, a betting event is a market, where the bookmaker and all the punters are the market participants. Opening a line, a bookmaker is opening this market and is ready to take trades on this market from other market participants. It is willing to sell to you a Team A win or buy a Team A win from you. Of course, it will do so at a different price in order to make some profit on those transactions. The spread between the two prices is the vig. You can see what the vig for a market is when you calculate how much you are going to lose if you bet on all possible outcomes. You have bought and sold a possible outcome ensuring the same return for you regardless of how the game ends. The bookmaker is pocketing the spread.
A betting event fits the definition of a market pretty nicely. The market forces are the ones creating the price of an event. Therefore, the bookmakers that play a leading role in this process (which are often the same bookies that open the line) are called market makers.
The soft bookmaker
The market maker bookmaker business model is an important one for the betting environment but is also not the only one, and not even the most popular one. The biggest bookmaker brands follow a different model. They invest more in marketing to attract as many square punters as possible. They offer generous bonuses to punters and have sponsorship deals with big sports franchises.
On the other hand, those bookmakers do not invest that much in having a perfect line. Such bookmakers wouldn’t want to take on the risk of opening the line for an event. They would often copy the market makers’ lines on most events. They also wouldn’t immediately move the line upon every single bet. Making a market is not their business. Therefore, their lines are not always the sharpest ones and they are sometimes referred to as soft bookmakers. Eventually, those bookmakers catch up with the market maker’s line after a line move, but only after a certain delay, which offers a window of opportunity for the arber / value bettor.
So while a soft bookmaker will not follow the principles of market making as strictly as a sharp one, still, by and large, they pay respect to them. Their limits also increase come game time. And any discrepancy between their and the market maker’s odds rarely lasts longer than a couple of minutes, after which the soft bookmaker adjusts.
The betting landscape
Different bookmakers have different lines – otherwise, technical value betting wouldn’t exist. Even if they are not exactly the same, those lines are deeply connected. At the end of the day, the line of an event is a very homogenous product being offered by different providers at a different price. Thus, arbitrage opportunities arise and even those prices out. Arbitrage and value betting providers like RebelBetting facilitate that process.
Therefore, the line on a certain event moves more or less synchronously in between different bookmakers (save for the occasional time delay at soft books as mentioned above). What is causing this synchronous movement across bookmakers is the invisible hand of the market. The line at any given time represents the market consensus. In general, the bigger the market (in terms of the total volume of bets), the more accurate the price.
Given that the lines across bookmakers are connected, it is not only the betting volume in one bookmaker but in all bookmakers as a total that shapes the line. As time goes by, the wagered total gets larger, bookies grow more confident in their line increasing the limits, which attracts even larger bets from the sharks who wouldn’t bother with the small limits. Therefore, the less time remaining to game time, the more accurate the line will be. Which in turn means, that the line at game time (a.k.a. the closing line) is the most accurate line there could be.
Throughout its lifecycle, the line only gets more accurate with the closing line being the most accurate one. What are the implications of this finding?
The closing line as an indicator
We have mentioned that some bookmakers have sharp lines and some have softer lines. The softer lines represent an opportunity for the bettor. However, while some books are known market makers, not all of their lines are necessarily very sharp, especially at (or close to) opening. The difference is not always clear cut and it is not easy to find out whether the bet we’ve made is good or not.
This is where the closing line comes in. Remember, the price at closing is in fact the “accurate” price. Evaluating our bet is easy – we must simply compare it with the closing line. If we got a better price for our bet than we would have had if we had bet at closing, we have made a good bet. This “better price” is also being referred to as closing line value or CLV. Having CLV on a long series of bets means that you are on the right track and even if variance has eaten into your bank, you can be confident that in the long-run you will be profitable.
Technical value betting
There are some simple but effective strategies that reliably produce CLV over the long run. Technical value betting (the strategy supported by the ValueBetting service of RebelBetting) is one such example.
Brand name bookmakers usually take a little bit of time to replicate the line movement of a market maker book. This delay opens up a window of opportunity for the bettor. Often the line movement at a market maker would be caused by new information entering the market, such as that an important player from the one team has been injured at training. Being able to bet the opposing team at the price that was available before the news came out is a great advantage. That is what RebelBetting is offering to its customers.
As in all betting strategies the volatility of returns can be huge, especially over a shorter bet series. However, in the long run the return on investment will tend to gravitate towards the CLV of your bets – this is especially the case with a clear cut strategy such as the one RebelBetting is offering.
How do you calculate the CLV?
The expected return of your bet should be similar to your CLV, which in turn is strongly affected by the closing line. The formula for calculating CLV is the following:
Stake * (Odds taken / (Closing Odds * (1 + Margin)) – 1)
The margin (also called juice, vig) is calculated as:
1/Odds_1 + 1/Odds_2 + … + 1/Odds_n – 1
Above I calculate the fair odds using the simplified formula Fair Odds = Odds * (1 + Margin).
If you want to be exact you can take Joseph Buchdahl’s formula (for 2-way market):
Fair Odds = 2 * Odds / (2 – Odds * Margin)
For a 3-way market simply use 3 instead of 2. This one is accounting for the favourite-longshot bias. But you should come along just fine with the simple formula above.
The CLV in ValueBetting
The ValueBetting service stores the Closing Line Value for all your placed value bets. It’s visible both at the top of the BetTracker and on your Reports page:
You can see that the profit curve (green) closely follows the CLV (blue). The value at bet placement (turquoise) is shown for completeness sake – it will always increase more than the CLV, and is a less important metric.
However, one could argue, perhaps sometimes it is not the soft bookmaker where you placed the bet that is in the wrong, but the sharp bookmaker and their closing line. We have seen above that in theory that shouldn’t be the case, but perhaps this is not telling the whole story. And if that were the case, such methodology cannot reliably identify value.
Fortunately, there is a way to test this. Let’s analyze the closing line value of the first 333,390 bets generated with the ValueBetting platform. Let us have a look:
We see that 86.3% of the platform’s bets have generated CLV. The average CLV has been 3.11%, in line with the average yield. Of course, you could have increased that if you focused on larger value bets.
The average flat yield percentage (resulting from level staking) is a bit larger. This is because when flat staking you won’t turn over as much money and therefore the yield (profit/turnover) is higher. Your profits will be lower when flat staking however.
The value at bet placement is 4.01% and will 7 times out of 10 higher than the CLV. The main reason is the margins shrink as we get closer to match start.
We can also see that:
1. ValueBetting reliably identifies value, as measured by the closing line
2. The closing line value is in line with the achieved yield
Those two findings confirm that with a long enough bet record everyone can make a profit with ValueBetting. The RebelBetting team also publishes the accumulated results of their users, which is showing pretty much the same thing.